CLINICAL TECHNOLOGY REVIEWEDITION 01 / SEPTEMBER 2026
ScribeStandard.Explore results

SCRIBE RESULTS / 22 SEPTEMBER 2026

Heidi

Averages across 6 graded runs of 11 consultations, the same audio and instruction for every scribe. Wide variation between runs, additional run included for fine tuning.

1m 52sTime to a signable note · ranked 2 of 7
11%Notes ready to sign as written · ranked 5 of 7
8.7Significant note errors per run · ranked 5 of 7
4.3Hallucination flags per run · ranked 3 of 7
13.9%Word error rate · ranked 3 of 7

Summary

Heidi ranked 2 of 7 for time to a signable note at 1m 52s and for review time at 1m 26s. Time saved per note was 3m, also ranked 2 of 7. Its word error rate was 13.9%, ranked 3 of 7.

11% of Heidi's notes were ready to sign as written, ranked 5 of 7. Significant note errors averaged 8.7 per run, ranked 5 of 7, and ranged from 2.0 to 13.0 between runs. Clinical coverage was 88%, ranked 6 of 7.

Every measure

MeasureAverageRun rangeRank
Time to a signable noteWait from pressing stop to the graded note, plus review time: how long until the note can be signed if it is reviewed straight away.1m 52s1m 40s–1m 57s2 of 7
Notes ready to sign as writtenShare of notes that captured every checklist fact in full with no hallucination flags, so nothing needed editing.11%9%–18%5 of 7
Editing effort0% means no editing required; 100% means writing the full note by hand. Fixes are weighted by the work they take: partial fact 1, missing fact 2, hallucination flag 3, and +2 when a fact is captured wrongly.16%11%–18%4 of 7
Review time per noteEstimated clinician time to proofread and fix one note (190 wpm reading, 5 s to recall and 40 wpm to type each missing or partial fact, 12 s to verify and delete each hallucination flag, including a wrong fact before it is retyped).1m 26s1m 14s–1m 32s2 of 7
Worst note, any runThe single slowest note to review and fix across every case and run.2m 48s3 of 7
Time saved per noteEstimated time to write the note yourself (5 s to recall each checklist fact, typing it at 40 wpm) minus review time.3m2m 54s–3m 12s2 of 7
Significant note errors per runMissed facts, partial facts and hallucinations that a blind AI rater judged could change diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, safety or the legal record, across 11 cases. Significance is a judgement call; the flat count is in Hallucination flags.8.72.0–13.05 of 7
Hallucination flags per runEvery claim in the note with no support in the consultation, counted flat: each one counts, however minor. No severity judgement. Across 11 cases.4.33.0–6.03 of 7
Edit actions per noteMissing items, partial items and hallucination flags a clinician would need to fix, per note.2.211.55–2.824 of 7
Clinical coverageShare of each case checklist captured by the note (partial counts as half).88%84%–92%6 of 7
Significant transcript errors per runMis-heard words that change clinical meaning, rated blind, across 11 cases.20.316.0–24.03 of 7
Word error ratePooled word error rate per run against the human reference. Every word counts equally, including fillers.13.9%13.5%–14.2%3 of 7
Stop to prompted noteMedian time from pressing stop to the note written to our instruction, per run.26s25s–27s4 of 6
Data per consultAverage network data per consultation, per run.43.3 MB41.0 MB–46.1 MB7 of 7

Definitions and weights are in the methodology. Compare Heidi head to head ↗

Consultations